ABSTRACT
HLA molecules are key restrictive elements to present intracellular antigens at the crossroads of an effective T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2. To determine the impact of the HLA genotype on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 courses, we investigated data from 6,919 infected individuals. HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 allotypes grouped into HLA supertypes by functional or predicted structural similarities of the peptide-binding grooves did not predict COVID-19 severity. Further, we did not observe a heterozygote advantage or a benefit from HLA diplotypes with more divergent physicochemical peptide-binding properties. Finally, numbers of in silico predicted viral T-cell epitopes did not correlate with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. These findings suggest that the HLA genotype is no major factor determining COVID-19 severity. Moreover, our data suggest that the spike glycoprotein alone may allow for abundant T-cell epitopes to mount robust T-cell responses not limited by the HLA genotype.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/immunology , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/immunology , Adult , Computer Simulation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/genetics , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Female , Genotype , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of the 32 bp deletion (CCR5Δ32) in the coding region of the C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) on the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and severe COVID-19. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among stem cell donors registered with DKMS in Germany. Genetic information was linked to self-reported COVID-19 outcome data. Multivariable regression models were fitted to determine the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2, severe respiratory tract infection (RTI) and respiratory hospitalization. RESULTS: CCR5 information was available for 110 544 donors who were tested at least once for SARS-CoV-2; 5536 reported SARS-CoV-2 infection. For 4758 donors, the COVID-19 disease course was fully evaluable; 498 reported no symptoms, 1227 described symptoms of severe respiratory tract infection, of whom 164 required respiratory hospitalization. The distribution of CCR5Δ32 genotypes (homozygous wild-type vs CCR5Δ32 present) did not differ significantly between individuals with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.03, P = 0.21) nor between individuals with or without symptomatic infection (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.45, P = 0.32), severe RTI (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88-1.22, P = 0.68) or respiratory hospitalization (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79-1.69, P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Our data implicate that CCR5Δ32 mutations do not determine the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections nor the disease course. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We registered the study with the German Center for Infection Research (https://dzif.clinicalsite.org/de/cat/2099/trial/4361).